GFN logoGFNGlobal FinCrime Network
Subscribe

GFN Visual Series

The Architecture of a Modern AML Program

A clear breakdown of the core components that make up a modern AML program — from governance and CDD to monitoring, investigations, reporting, and continuous improvement.

Click the image to view it in full resolution.

The Architecture of a Modern AML Program

A modern Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program is no longer a checklist of isolated controls.
It is an integrated ecosystem — a coordinated framework of governance, data, technology, monitoring, risk assessment, and investigative processes that work together to detect, prevent, and mitigate financial crime.

This visual outlines the core pillars of a modern AML architecture, followed by a detailed explanation of each component.

1. Governance & Compliance Framework

A strong AML program begins with structure — the formal foundations that define responsibility, oversight, and accountability.

Key Elements

  • Board & Senior Management Oversight
    Leadership defines risk appetite and ensures program alignment.

  • MLRO / Compliance Leadership
    A designated officer responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining the program.

  • Policies & Procedures
    Clear, updated documentation aligned with regulatory expectations.

  • Training & Certification
    Mandatory, role-based education across the organization.

  • Internal Controls & Independent Testing
    Audits and validations that ensure the program performs as intended.

Purpose: Governance ensures the AML program is intentional, documented, risk-based, and enforceable.

2. Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC)

CDD is the gateway to the financial system — the process that determines who the institution is dealing with.

Core Components

  • Customer Identification & Verification
    Reliable, risk-based onboarding using trusted data sources.

  • Beneficial Ownership Detection
    Understanding who ultimately controls or benefits from the entity.

  • Risk Rating Assignment
    Initial and ongoing customer risk scoring based on geography, behavior, occupation, products, and ownership structure.

  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)
    Applied to higher-risk customers such as PEPs, complex businesses, or high-risk industries.

Purpose: CDD establishes the foundation for risk-based monitoring and ongoing assessments.

3. Transaction Monitoring & Behavioral Analytics

This is the detection engine of the AML program — identifying unusual or suspicious patterns.

Monitoring Architecture

  • Scenario-Based Rules
    Thresholds, velocity triggers, behavioral red flags.

  • Machine Learning & Behavioral Models
    More adaptive detection of complex or subtle patterns.

  • Entity Resolution
    Linking customers, accounts, and devices into unified profiles.

  • Real-Time & Batch Monitoring
    Coverage across payments, wires, ACH, card, crypto, and internal transfers.

  • Alert Prioritization
    Scoring and triaging alerts to manage workload and reduce noise.

Purpose: Monitoring identifies activity that requires human review and investigation.

4. Screening (Sanctions, PEP, Adverse Media)

Screening protects institutions from engaging with prohibited or high-risk individuals and entities.

Screening Layers

  • Sanctions Screening
    OFAC, EU, UN, HMT, and jurisdictional lists.

  • PEP Screening
    Identifying politically exposed persons and close associates.

  • Adverse Media Screening
    Detecting reputational risks and prior involvement in criminal activity.

  • Ongoing Monitoring
    Alerts triggered when watchlists or customer data change.

Purpose: Screening prevents onboarding or transacting with sanctioned or high-risk parties.

5. Risk Assessment Framework

AML programs rely on a clear, current understanding of organizational risk exposure.

Risk Categories

  • Customer Risk — industry, occupation, ownership, behavioral patterns
  • Product/Service Risk — liquidity, anonymity, speed, misuse potential
  • Geographic Risk — corruption, sanctions exposure, weak AML regimes
  • Channel Risk — branch, online, correspondent banking, agents

Institution-Wide Risk Assessment (IWRA)

Performed annually or when significant business changes occur.

Purpose: The risk assessment calibrates the entire risk-based approach (RBA), informing controls, monitoring, and resource allocation.

6. Investigations & Case Management

Once alerts are generated, investigations determine whether suspicion is substantiated.

Core Components

  • Alert Review
    Analysts assess context, activity history, and behavioral indicators.

  • Case Creation & Escalation
    Grouping related alerts into coherent cases.

  • Evidence Gathering
    Pulling transactional data, KYC files, OSINT, and historical interactions.

  • Narrative Building
    Producing a clear, factual explanation of the observed behavior.

  • Risk-Based Decisioning
    Clear outcomes: close, escalate, restrict, or offboard.

Purpose: Investigations bridge the gap between detection and regulatory reporting.

7. SAR/STR Reporting & Regulatory Engagement

If suspicion remains after investigation, institutions must report it.

SAR/STR Pipeline

  • Suspicion Determination
    Based on evidence, context, and analyst judgment.

  • Narrative Writing
    Clear, objective descriptions of activity and rationale.

  • Timely Filing
    Meeting jurisdiction-specific regulatory deadlines.

  • Regulator Communication
    Responding to follow-up requests or inquiries.

Purpose: Reporting ensures enforcement bodies receive actionable intelligence.

8. Data Infrastructure & Technology Stack

Modern AML programs are fundamentally data-driven.

Key Infrastructure Elements

  • Unified Data Layer
    Integrated customer, transaction, and device data.

  • Data Quality Controls
    Deduplication, validation, enrichment.

  • APIs & Integrations
    External data, watchlists, identity systems, and internal services.

  • Audit Trails & Logging
    Full transparency and traceability for all actions.

  • Scalable Architecture
    Handling large real-time payment flows, crypto, card transactions, and more.

Purpose: Technology powers the speed, accuracy, and resilience of AML operations.

9. Continuous Improvement & Model Governance

AML programs must evolve alongside threats, technology, and regulation.

Key Components

  • Model Validation
    Testing rules, thresholds, and ML models.

  • Tuning & Optimization
    Reducing false positives and improving performance.

  • Quality Assurance (QA)
    Reviewing investigative output and decision quality.

  • Regulatory Updates
    Adapting to new laws, guidance, and typologies.

  • Training & Upskilling
    Ensuring analysts and teams continue to grow.

Purpose: Continuous improvement keeps the program effective as risks and regulatory expectations evolve.

Putting It All Together — The AML Program as a System

A modern AML program is an interconnected ecosystem:

  • Governance sets direction and oversight
  • CDD defines customer risk
  • Screening and monitoring detect threats
  • Investigations evaluate suspicion
  • SAR/STR reporting fulfills legal obligations
  • Data infrastructure powers every layer
  • Continuous improvement ensures long-term effectiveness

The strength of an AML program comes not from individual components, but from how seamlessly they integrate and reinforce each other.

Note on AI-Assisted Visual Creation

Our infographics use AI in the creation process, and we continuously refine our visuals.
If you notice anything that can be improved or clarified, please let us know — your feedback helps strengthen the FinCrime community.

This infographic was created with the support of AI. We continuously refine our visuals — if you notice anything that can be improved, please let us know.